Find local 2011 Chevrolet. Find cool custom and classic cars, muscle cars, SUVs, and trucks and browse all 991,627 vehicle pictures, for sale info, parts and builder's page at CarDomain.com. The frequently asked questions list serves as a central clearinghouse of information that the mailing list has gathered about the Impala. The FAQ is an active thing. Chevrolet Camaro Reviews and Rating. After seven years off the market, the Chevrolet Camaro took advantage of pent- up demand to become the bestseller in its exclusive segment, outselling the Ford Mustang, Dodge Challenger and Hyundai Genesis coupe. Much of Camaro’s popularity has to do with its styling, which is a modern interpretation of the first- generation, 1. Based on General Motors’ Zeta rear- wheel- drive platform, the Camaro feels not so much like that late- . While the 2. 01. 1 Camaro is about the same length as a ’6. The enthusiast version is the 4. ![]() ![]() SS (4. 00 horsepower with the automatic transmission). Camaro has shaken up the segment, though, with its base model’s 3. V- 6, a powerful and fuel- efficient engine that pushed Ford into upgrading its Mustang powerplant lineup. Chevy will add a Camaro convertible early in ’1. Z/2. 8 high- performance model later in the year. The musclecar wars have just begun. Bodystyle: Coupe. Engines: 3. 6. L V- 6, 6. L V- 8. Transmissions: 6- speed manual, 6- speed automatic. Models: LS, LT, 2. LT, SS, 2. SSTrumping Mustang’s 3. V- 6, the rating for Camaro’s direct injection V- 6 is up 8 horses, to 3. All models are available with Synergy Green Metallic paint for a limited time, and Synergy Green interior panels are available on 2. LT and 2. SS. Heads- up display becomes standard on 2. LT and 2. SS. All models get six months of free On. Star Directions and Connections. A long- hood, short- deck and radical tumblehome evoke Chevy’s design heyday. Its 6. 7- degree windshield rake contributes to a big on the outside, small on the inside feel. The RS package is available on LT and SS. ![]() General 5th generation Camaro topics not covered by other subforums. Automotive fiberglass body parts for muscle cars, street, restoration and drag racing. The Lockheed U-2, nicknamed "Dragon Lady ", is an American single-jet engine, ultra-high altitude reconnaissance aircraft operated by the United States Air Force. The retro/heritage design extends to the four- passenger interior, with deep, recessed gauges in square housings, three- spoke wheel and optional console- mounted gauge package, standard on 2. LT and 2. SS. Camaro SS is more powerful than its rivals, although excessive weight hampers performance. It’s a responsive performer but with a heavy feel. Motor Trend recorded a 1. Its 2. 5. 2 seconds at 0. MT Figure- 8 is equally impressive. Choose the smooth V- 6 version and you’ll get decent performance and not give up much handling. Four front- seat airbags, side curtains front and rear, door interlock pins, Stabili. Trak dynamic stability control and four- wheel disc brakes with hydraulic brake assist are standard on all models. SS models get Brembo four- piston brake calipers. V- 6: 1. 7 mpg city/2. V- 8: 1. 6 mpg city/2. Straight- line performance. Cornering grip. Styling. Machismo. Value. Interior space. Weighty feel. Complicated option sheet. A very compelling sports coupe Star. Waymo, Google’s autonomous vehicle division, confirmed that it’s developing self-driving long-haul trucks earlier this month. Now we know what they look like. EHow Auto gets you on the fast track with repair, maintenance, and shopping advice. Whether you're jump starting a battery or insuring a new car, we can help. As much as our readership likes to dislike Priuses, you have to admit that there is always going to be a need for a really efficient, environmentally-friendly car. Welcome to the Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link. Star. Star. Star. No- Star. Show Full Review. Lockheed U- 2 - Wikipedia. The Lockheed U- 2, nicknamed . It provides day and night, high- altitude (7. In 1. 96. 0, Gary Powerswas shot down in a CIA U- 2. A over the Soviet Union by a surface- to- air missile (SAM). Another U- 2, piloted by Major Rudolf Anderson, Jr., was lost in a similar fashion during the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1. The U- 2 is one of a handful of aircraft types to have served the USAF for over 5. The newest models (TR- 1, U- 2. R, U- 2. S) entered service in the 1. The current model, the U- 2. S, received its most recent technical upgrade in 2. They have taken part in post–Cold War conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, and supported several multinational NATO operations. Development. Into the 1. American government had on facilities deep inside the Soviet Union were German Luftwaffe photographs taken during the war of territory west of the Ural Mountains, so overflights to take aerial photographs of the Soviet Union began. After 1. 95. 0, Soviet air defenses aggressively attacked all aircraft near the country's borders—sometimes even those over Japanese airspace—and the existing reconnaissance aircraft, primarily bombers converted for reconnaissance duty such as the Boeing RB- 4. Richard Leghorn of the USAF suggested that an aircraft that could fly at 6. Mi. G- 1. 7, the Soviet Union's best interceptor, which could barely reach 4. He and others believed that Soviet radar, which used American equipment provided during the war, could not track aircraft above 6. The British had already produced the PR3 photo- reconnaissance variant, but the USAF asked for English Electric's help to further modify the Martin B- 5. American licensed version of the Canberra) with long, narrow wings, new engines, and a lighter- than- normal airframe to reach 6. Air Research and Development Command mandated design changes that made the aircraft more durable for combat, but the resulting RB- 5. D aircraft of 1. 95. The Soviet Union, unlike the United States and Britain, had improved radar technology after the war, and could track aircraft above 6. The USAF decided to solicit designs only from smaller aircraft companies that could give the project more attention. Officials at Lockheed Aircraft Corporation heard about the project and decided to submit an unsolicited proposal. To save weight and increase altitude, Lockheed executive John Carter suggested that the design eliminate landing gear and avoid attempting to meet combat load factors for the airframe. The company asked Clarence . Johnson was Lockheed's best aeronautical engineer. He was also known for completing projects ahead of schedule, working in a separate division of the company, informally called the Skunk Works. The design was powered by the General Electric J7. It could reach an altitude of 7. ![]() In June 1. 95. 4, the USAF rejected the design in favor of the Bell X- 1. B- 5. 7. Reasons included the lack of landing gear, use of the J7. Pratt & Whitney J5. USAF believed, was more reliable. General Curtis Le. May of Strategic Air Command (SAC) walked out during a CL- 2. Talbott, were more positive about the CL- 2. Central Intelligence Agency's Office of Scientific Intelligence. ![]() ![]() ![]() At that time, the CIA depended on the military for overflights, and Director of Central Intelligence. Allen Dulles favored human over technical intelligence gathering methods. However, the Intelligence Systems Panel, a civilian group advising the USAF and CIA on aerial reconnaissance, had recognized by 1. RB- 5. 7D would not meet the 7. Allen Donovan of Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory believed was necessary for safety. The CIA told the panel about the CL- 2. USAF saw as flaws (the single engine and light load factor) appealed to Donovan, a sailplane enthusiast who believed that a sailplane was the type of high- altitude aircraft the panel was seeking. Bissell, Jr., that his agency should fund and operate this aircraft. Land believed that the military operating the CL- 2. Although Dulles remained reluctant to have the CIA conduct its own overflights, Land and James Killian of MIT told President Eisenhower about the aircraft; Eisenhower agreed that the CIA should be the operator. Dulles finally agreed, but some USAF officers opposed the project because they feared it would endanger the RB- 5. D and X- 1. 6. The USAF's Seaberg helped persuade his own agency to support the CL- 2. J5. 7 engine, and final approval for a joint USAF- CIA project (the first time the CIA dealt with sophisticated technology) came in November 1. ![]() Lockheed had meanwhile become busy with other projects and had to be persuaded to accept the CL- 2. Lockheed received a $2. March 1. 95. 5 for the first 2. Johnson's home in February 1. The company agreed to deliver the first aircraft by July of that year and the last by November 1. It did so, and for $3. When Johnson ordered altimeters calibrated to 8. CIA set up a cover story involving experimental rocket aircraft. Shell Oil developed a new low- volatility, low vapor pressure jet fuel that would not evaporate at high altitudes; the fuel became known as JP- 7, and manufacturing several hundred thousand gallons for the aircraft in 1. Esso's FLIT insect repellent. The aircraft was renamed the U- 2 in July 1. Article 3. 41, was delivered to Groom Lake. The new camera had a resolution of 2. This effort ultimately proved unsuccessful, and work began on a follow- on aircraft, which resulted in the Lockheed A- 1. Oxcart. Disclosed details say the design is essentially an improved U- 2 airframe with the same engine, service ceiling, sensors, and cockpit, with the main differences being an optional manning capability (something Lockheed has proposed for the U- 2 to the Air Force several times but has never gained traction) and low- observable characteristics. The Air Force has no requirement or timeframe for a next- generation High- Altitude Long Endurance (HALE) platform, but Lockheed sees a future need and wants something in development early. Having the option of an onboard pilot is considered a deterrent because it can be used in peacetime situations where unmanned aircraft would more likely be engaged, since there is no possibility of killing a person. The company's last attempt to create a stealth unmanned aircraft was the RQ- 3 Dark. Star, which never made it past flight testing and was canceled. Its name was changed to mean . Size, and thus cost, is kept down by having less endurance than the Global Hawk at around 2. RQ- 4 sortie even though it is capable of flying for 3. Although originally planned to be optionally- unmanned, some Lockheed officials are leaning towards a purely unmanned aircraft, as it is expected that issues with airspace integration of UAVs will be addressed by the time it will be introduced. The TR- X concept is aimed squarely at Air Force needs, and is not currently being marketed to the CIA or other government agencies. It would have increased power and cooling to accommodate new sensors, communication equipment, electronic warfare suites, and perhaps even offensive or defensive laser weapons. TR- X could be ready for service in the 2. U- 2s and RQ- 4s. Its maximum takeoff weight would be greater than either the U- 2's or RQ- 4's at around 5. It will use the same F1. U- 2, but thrust could increase to 1. VA; service ceiling would increase to 7. The TR- X is meant to be . JPTS is a high thermal stability, high altitude fuel, created specifically as fuel for the U- 2. JPTS has a lower freeze point, higher viscosity, and higher thermal stability than standard Air Force fuels. In 1. 99. 9, the United States Air Force spent approximately $1. U- 2 aircraft and was looking for a lower cost alternative. JPTS is a specialty fuel and as such has limited worldwide availability and costs over three times the per- gallon price of the Air Force's primary jet fuel, JP- 8. Research is under way to find a cheaper and easier alternative involving additives to generally used jet fuels. A JP- 8 based alternative, JP- 8+1. LT, is being considered. JP- 8+1. 00 has increased thermal stability by 1. Martin Knutson said that it . The U- 2. S and TU- 2. S variants incorporated the even more powerful General Electric F1. To maintain their operational ceiling of 7. U- 2. A and U- 2. C models had to fly very near their never- exceed speed (VNE). The margin between that maximum speed and the stall speed at that altitude was only 1. This narrow window is called the . A stall would cause a loss of altitude, possibly leading to detection and overstress of the airframe. However, at lower altitudes, the higher air density and lack of a power assisted control system makes the aircraft very difficult to fly. Control inputs must be extreme to achieve the desired response, and a great deal of physical strength is needed to operate the controls in this manner. The U- 2 is very sensitive to crosswinds, which, together with its tendency to float over the runway, makes the aircraft notoriously difficult to land. As it approaches the runway, the cushion of air provided by the high- lift wings in ground effect is so pronounced that the U- 2 will not land unless the wing is fully stalled. A landing U- 2 is accompanied on the ground by a chase car and an assisting U- 2 pilot calling off the angles and decreasing aircraft height as the aircraft descends. The rear wheels are coupled to the rudder to provide steering during taxiing. To maintain balance while taxiing, two auxiliary wheels, called . These fit into sockets underneath each wing at about mid- span, and fall off during takeoff. To protect the wings during landing, each wingtip has a titanium skid. After the U- 2 comes to a halt, the ground crew re- installs the pogos one wing at a time, then the aircraft taxis to parking. While pilots can drink water and eat various liquid foods in squeezable containers. Most pilots chose to not take with them the suicide pill offered before missions. If put in the mouth and bitten, the . After a pilot almost accidentally ingested an L- pill instead of candy during a December 1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
September 2017
Categories |